 |
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD
Minutes
Thursday, June 6, 2002 at 10:00 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michael Nevin (Chair), John McLemore
(Vice Chair), Maria Ayerdi, Mike Burns, Arthur Lloyd, Sophie Maxwell, Steve
Schmidt, Manny Valerio, Ken Yeager, Sue Lempert (MTC Liaison)
STAFF PRESENT: Mike Scanlon, David Miller, Jim
Gallagher, Cheryl Cavitt, George Cameron, Roger Contreras, Chuck Harvey, Rita
Haskin, Jerry Kirzner, Aurora Jose, Liz Wiecha
Chair Nevin called the meeting to order at 10:05 a.m. Ms. Lempert led the
pledge of allegiance to the flag.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Ed DeLanoy, San Carlos, spoke on a lecture he
recently attended where R.E.G. Davis, curator of Air Transport concluded, in
general, travel for distances of up to 400 miles could be better served by
high-speed rail. Mr. DeLanoy stated this might influence planning for possible
expansion of the Bay Area's commercial airports. He also mentioned he had a
pleasant conversation with Lou Turpin regarding direct connection of High Speed
Rail to the airport.
Norman Rolfe, San Francisco, suggested reexamination of the RRX bus schedule.
The last service runs at 8 p.m. He stated by ending the bus service at 8 p.m.,
Caltrain will definitely lose ridership for those who stay out later than 8.
Because there is no transportation returning home, people will drive going to
and coming back from their destinations.
Joseph Dittberner, Sunnyvale, who gave his speaker card late, had a one-on-one
conversation regarding his concern with Director Valerio.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Upon request of Director Burns, Item (c)
pertaining to Grant Funds for Clean Air was severed from the consent calendar.
The Board, by unanimous vote, approved items (a) Adoption of Minutes of May 2,
2002; and (b) Statement of Revenues and Expenses, April 2002.
- Authorization to File an Application for Grant Funds for Clean Air in
the Amount of $1,000,000 for the Support of the Caltrain Shuttle Bus
Program
Director Burns questioned how determinations were made with regard to
shuttle bus service receiving such funds. Ian McAvoy responded there are
standards that should be met and there is also a priority process. Grant
applications are given to existing shuttles and potential new ones.
Director Burns asked if these funds could also be made available to San
Francisco. Chuck Harvey, Chief Operating Officer, responded the Bay Area
Air Quality Management District that oversees the grant applications does
not look at areas with numerous existing transit services. They look for
opportunities to fund connecting services where there is not a lot of
existing bus service. Caltrain shuttle buses are designed specifically to
provide a transportation link for Caltrain customers who, otherwise, may
not be riding Caltrain if they could not get from the Caltrain station to
another location. Shuttle service is funded partially by employers.
Passengers do not pay any fare.
The Board, by roll call, unanimously approved the proposed action
(Resolution No. 2002-17).
CHAIRPERSON'S REPORT
There was no report at this time.
MTC LIAISON REPORT
Ms. Sue Lempert reported the Bay Crossing Study
will meet in this Auditorium on June 19th at 1:30 p.m. Final recommendations
will be discussed at the meeting prior to presenting to the commission. The
ABAG-MTC merger is still moving forward. In relation to the Capital Budget
that is scheduled for action today, she commented electrification is very
important. She encouraged the Board members to exercise their leadership and go
forward with it.
REPORT OF CITIZENS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE (CAC)
Mike Rodriguez, CAC Chair, reported:
- Three members of the JPB CAC attended each public hearing held at San
Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara regarding the proposed schedule changes.
- CAC members, Rita Ching of Santa Clara County and Sam Shank of San
Mateo are resigning from the Committee effective next month. Mr. Rodriguez
recognized Ms. Ching for her efforts in developing the CAC by-laws, and Mr.
Shank for his contribution towards the improvement of the Caltrain web site.
- He noted the CAC's unanimous support for the adoption of the
accelerated electrification program.
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR
- Caltrain Performance Report
Executive Director Michael Scanlon reported average weekday ridership
decreased by 9.3 percent. On-time performance is at 94.2 percent compared
to 94.8 percent at the same time last year. He noted this has been the
18th consecutive month wherein on-time performance has been over the 90
percent mark. Shuttle Service showed signs of slight recovery. Baseball
ridership is up 3 percent over last April.
Mr. Scanlon further reported:
- At the KFOG Kaboom Event last month, Caltrain carried about 9,000
people for the event alone. Extra cars and extra trips were added due to
heavy demand.
- Public meetings on the proposed reduction of Caltrain trips from 80 to
76 are going on. Public input will be accepted until June 14.
- At the "Bay to Breakers" run, SamTrans buses had about 1,250 riders in
the morning, that headed to the race. Due to inclement weather, people went
home by regular scheduled bus service throughout the day. On the final
scheduled return trip, ridership was over 300.
- On May 15 last month, at the "Operation Lifesaver" event for children,
about 300 school children went from San Jose to Gilroy and back. As part of
overall safety program, reaching out and teaching children at very young age
will pay dividends down the road.
- "Kids are Giants Too" event held on May 29 went very well. Round trip
service to PacBell Park was made available to the school children.
- Mr. Scanlon was pleased that the District was able to help out and
congratulated everyone in San Francisco on the Muni groundbreaking event of
the Light Rail Extension at 3rd Street.
- He presented the "Monthly Safety and Security Report" and called
special attention to a partnership that is being done for safety in
preparation for the work that will be done on the CTX.
- Upcoming events for the month of June are:
- June 23, Gay Pride Parade - Caltrain will provide extra round trips,
and will also be running a longer scheduled train ride.
- June 28, groundbreaking event for the CTX Project (Baby Bullet) at
the South San Francisco Caltrain Station.
- July 4, the steam engine car 2472 will be accommodated for a round
trip from San Francisco to San Jose with one display stop in Redwood City.
- Preview of Redesigned Web Site
Rita Haskin, Chief Communications Officer, gave a video presentation on the
new Caltrain web site that will be launched on Monday, June 10. She
discussed its features and demonstrated getting access and doing navigation.
Director Schmidt suggested making the Caltrain logo more visible while
Director McLemore suggested putting a box for the public to put in their
comments. Ms. Haskin said the development of the web site will continue and
more changes will be made to make it more user friendly.
- 76 Train Schedule Update
Chuck Harvey, Chief Operating Officer, reported the public process on the
proposed reduction of train schedule from 80 to 76 daily to meet the JPB
FY 2003 Operating Budget objective has started. He reiterated feedback
from the public will be taken until Friday, June 14. He noted staff will
do their best to make necessary adjustments where needed. Concerns
received were on the stopping patterns, particularly in South San Francisco.
These concerns will be addressed. Stopping patterns in South San Francisco
will be increased.
Jeff Carter, Burlingame, hoped that stops on 22nd street would also be
reexamined. He stated the patterns are different everyday. Also, because
of the current budget crunch, he suggested going to legislators to get some
help by increasing sales tax.
- CTX Communications/Bus Bridge Update
Mr. Harvey reported the first weekend closure is scheduled for July 6. The
first replacement bus service (RRX) will operate on July 6 and 7. This
service will be operated by SamTrans. Schedules have been published. The
first San Francisco Giants home games after the shutdown are on July 13 and
14. The first BB routes to PacBell Park will run on that same weekend.
Both SamTrans and VTA will be running this operation.
Rita Haskin gave a presentation on all the outreach activities that are
going on to get ready for the Caltrain weekend shutdown. She itemized all
the methods adopted in getting information out to everyone (internal and
external audiences, riders and non-riders) to make them aware of trains not
running on weekends. Written informations are in different languages to
reach the non-English speaking public. She also noted two pre-activity
ambassadorships scheduled in San Francisco and Palo Alto. SamTrans
employees will be handing out information and making station announcements
at both sites. These sites were chosen since they have the highest
ridership on weekends within the three counties.
Director Burns inquired what is being done to coordinate with all of other
operators on the corridor. Ms. Haskin informed that staff is working with
Muni. The information will be on their web site and at their visual
message signs at the metro stations. Same coordination is being done with
VTA.
Director Burns suggested working with the Giants in putting the information
on their screen during the games. Ms. Haskin and Mr. Harvey assured that
this could be arranged.
Jeff Carter reminded that on special events happening in San Francisco, a
lot of people go to the City. He hoped that all these riders would get
rides because it is very important that people get a good experience. He
also suggested staff working on a seamless transit connection so as not to
inconvenience passengers holding monthly passes by paying additional fare.
He added people buy monthly pass with the intention of using it on weekends.
- Update on MUNI Shuttle Bus Service
Executive Director Scanlon reminded that this item is a follow up of last
month's approval of the Operating Budget. This piece was held out due to
the concern on shuttles in San Francisco.
Chuck Harvey gave an update on the San Francisco shuttle routes known as
the "X" shuttles at the 4th and King station. He stated Muni runs three
express lines for Caltrain and they are extended out to the Presidio for
their customers. These routes are used only by Caltrain customers but as
they extend out into the City, they are used by some other non-Caltrain
riders. They are routes run by the JPB and the JPB subsidizes and collects
fares. There are over a thousand daily morning riders. The p.m. riders
disappear because they use various methods of transportation to get back to
the station. Mr. Harvey stated between 25 and 30 percent of Caltrain
riders in the morning coming in on Caltrain use shuttle routes.
The JPB Board adopted the FY 2003 budget without provision for annual cost
to operate these shuttle routes. An amount of $100,000 was dedicated to
operate these shuttle routes for approximately 8 to 10 weeks, anticipating
that Muni would be able to cut their runs, cancel the service and do public
notices.
Following the Board's request, staff looked at different options pertaining
to this service. After working with San Francisco Muni, staff came up with
the proposal that JPB would pay for the a.m. service only and will operate
14 of the current 28 a.m. trips. These trips were selected based on
ridership. San Francisco has agreed to pay for the a.m. extensions beyond
the downtown area to the Presidio and the p.m. 82 "X" trips coming back.
San Francisco Muni has agreed to operate the level of service at $200,000
cost. In addition to the $100,000 that is already in the JPB approved
budget, the JPB will be able to find the other $100,000 and operate the
service for FY 2003. No additional member agency contributions will be
required to fund the "X" shuttles at the proposed rate.
Staff's recommendation is Board approval of maintaining the shuttle service
to adopt the proposed reduced level of service and direct the completion of
a revised Memorandum of Understanding with Muni for the operation of the
service under the approved FY 2003 budget.
Director Burns expressed concern that with the big demand for the service
and the reduced number of routes, service level would not be attractive but
given the budget situation that the JPB is facing, he understood the fiscal
realities. He supported staff's recommendation with a reminder to keep an
eye on this, to revisit this three months after its implementation and be
able to act accordingly. He also pointed out that the most compelling
complaint that he received with regard to this issue was that there was no
public input or notification prior to the Board taking action on the budget.
The Board actually voted to eliminate these services from the budget
without any input from passengers of the shuttles. He advised that in the
future, staff should exercise due diligence.
Mr. Scanlon clarified that the original intent was to make the elimination
effective sometime in late August so that notices and other necessary
actions could be done. This component was excluded from the vote last
meeting.
Attorney Miller advised that the budget was adopted with the understanding
that this matter will be revisited with anticipated modifications.
The Board unanimously approved the proposed actions.
APPROVAL OF AWARD OF
CONTRACT TO JOHN GLENN ADJUSTERS FOR CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR A
THREE-YEAR TERM AT AN ESTIMATED COST OF $176,750 WITH TWO ADDITIONAL ONE-YEAR
OPTIONAL TERMS
Gary Lambert, Manager of Risk Management,
proposed approval of award of contract to John Glenn Adjusters for the handling
of public liability claims against the JPB which fall within the self-insured
retention and deductibles.
The Board, by roll call, unanimously approved the action (Resolution No.
2002-18).
APPROVAL OF PROPOSED DBE
OVERALL ANNUAL GOAL FOR FY 2002-2003
Raymond Lee, DBE Officer, stated the goals were
analyzed in accordance with the prescribed Federal methodologies that include
availability of DBEs in the work areas. As part of the Federal program, the
JPB is required to publish the goals in the newspapers to solicit public
comments. The DBE Review Committee is recommending Board approval of
publishing the proposed goals and in the event that there are no public
comments that require a change to the proposed goals, that the Executive
Director be authorized to formally adopt the goals.
After Mr. Lee had addressed questions from Director Maxwell, the Board, by roll
call, unanimously approved the proposed actions (Resolution No. 2002-19).
APPROVAL OF THE CAPITAL
BUDGET
Ian McAvoy, Deputy Chief of Development, reported
the JPB has been implementing the Rapid Rail Program for the last four years.
For the time being, work is being done under the principles of the previous
Rapid Rail Program. He stated staff is committed to its accelerated
implementation. Mr. McAvoy illustrated the funding and the projects that were
implemented through the years. He also showed what projects were done and what
are still needed to be done. He outlined the components of the FY 2003 budget
and the projects that are lined up, some of which are the rehabilitation of the
railroad and electrification.
Mr. McAvoy presented two budgets for examination of the Board, namely Budget 1
and Budget 2. Budget 1 , supported by San Mateo and San Francisco SCC members,
includes funding for the acceleration of the Rapid Rail Program and
electrification; while Budget 2 is a Rapid Rail only budget. It does not
provide funding for electrification. Budget 2 is supported by VTA. Budget 1 is
an $83 million budget while Budget 2 is $74 million. The difference is $8.6
million, which is the electrification component of the budget. This amount
translates to $2.7 million for each of the three JPB agencies. Mr. McAvoy also
described the local match requirements.
Public Comments:
- Vaughn Wolffe, RailPAC, commented electrification is the only part of the
Rapid Rail Program that the citizens proposed. Not doing it for 10 or 15 years
is not an option because this is one thing riders wanted and are willing to pay
for. They voted for this in Measure A.
- Norman Rolfe, San Francisco, cited the great advantages of
electrification and encouraged the Board to proceed with it.
- Jeff Carter, Burlingame, recommended adoption of Budget 1 and asked that the
Board keep it moving. He reminded delay on the project would make it more
expensive.
- Eugene Bradley, Santa Clara VTA Union, disagrees with VTA in
supporting Rapid Rail Project only instead of Rapid Rail and electrification.
He stressed that electrification will put Caltrain in the 21st century as a
viable, regional transit choice for riders along the Peninsula and Santa
Clara County. He requested approval of Budget 1.
- Andy Chow, Bay Rail Alliance, encouraged the Board to support Budget
1 because of its benefits to the riders. He pointed out that VTA should help
electrify.
- Paul Wendt, Belmont, urged the Board to keep electrification in the
budget. He reminded that people in Santa Clara County did include
electrification in Measure A.
- Patrick More, Sierra Club, talked about air pollution. Electric
trains are quicker, quieter and not as air polluting. It is a great solution
to a lot of issues.
- Bruce Jenkins, TRAC, speaking also for himself, pushed for the
approval of the budget with electrification.
Board discussion of the budgets ensued.
Director Yeager stated electrification is certainly the direction everyone wants
to go. As an aftermath of the September 11 event, VTA is facing financial
difficulties to the point that they have to lay-off employees. He proposed
delaying for two weeks approval of the Capital Budget to give Santa Clara County
an opportunity to see if there is any VTA or Measure B funds, or other sources
for electrification.
Executive Director Scanlon noted unlike the Operating Budget, this Capital
Budget could hold until the July 11th Board meeting.
Director Schmidt made known his position that Budget 2 is not acceptable to him
and not to the patrons of Caltrain. He remarked approval of the budget today
would instruct VTA to find money for electrification.
Director Yeager suggested that all members re-examine their local match sources
and asked support of electrification. He urged the three agencies to go back and
see if there is any fund that they could find.
Mr. Scanlon advised that until the environmental document is completed, the JPB
cannot qualify for any Federal money. Mr. McAvoy added staff proposed to use
local money for electrification last year because JPB cannot use Federal money
due to State environmental requirements. Right now, the environmental report is
expected to be submitted to the FTA sometime early in 2003. The FTA reviews it
and makes a decision on the project. Once that decision is made and the
environmental process is complete, JPB can use Federal money for the project.
Mr. McAvoy further explained the complexities of the use of Federal funds and
local match.
Director McLemore pointed out that the extension is being asked because the VTA
budget is scheduled for action by the Board tonight. Director Yeager would like
to bring some of the issues to the Board tonight and bring up the different
budget options. He mentioned some of the avenues that could be explored to raise
some of the needed money such as bridge loans between different transit agencies
and money trading. Also, they have not gone to the County to tell them of the
needs and ask for their support.
Director Lloyd voiced his full support of the electrification and its
accelerated implementation. He stated this is a regional operation. He urged the
Board to move forward and not delay this project any longer.
Director Valerio supported Director Yeager's motion and advised added time is of
value. Santa Clara is committed to electrification and it is a matter of finding
resources to do it.
Director Maxwell encouraged all member agencies to go together as a group. She
stated as a region, it is extremely important to find funds for the program. She
invited Jose Luis Moscovich of San Francisco TA to speak and give some ideas as
to what could be done.
Mr. Moscovich looked at it as a timing issue. It can be worked out with pooled
resources of the three partners. He mentioned there are State funds that the
Authority has already programmed through the City of San Francisco's own share
of the State Transportation Improvement Program. There will be some flexibility
to move these funds around and make it work.
Director Burns supported the deferment of the decision on the Capital Budget
with an amendment to vote on Budget No. 1, to eliminate Budget No. 2 from
consideration. This is not a decision between budgets 1 and 2. He explained,
the vote that is being deferred is on the Capital Budget No. 1, that there is no
alternative.
Director Nevin underscored the importance of electrification envisioning the
kind of train service the Board would like to take to the year 2008 or 2010.
He also pointed out this is the best example of regionalism - that the
commitment of local funds is subject to approval of the member agency Boards. He
reiterated that the motion is not just to include continuation but to remove
Budget 2 from consideration.
Director McLemore stated in Santa Clara County, electrification is the No. 1
goal and it is absolutely important to continue the momentum and go forward.
VTA has the will to make this happen, they just have to find the way.
Director Ayerdi, taking into consideration the comments on commitment of local
funds subject to approval by the member agency governing board, the need to keep
the momentum, and that everyone is favoring electrification, proposed the Board
vote for Capital Budget No. 1.
Director McLemore declined Board action on Budget No. 1 and stated the way the
VTA staff is proposing to support electrification is way on the other end of the
spectrum. VTA needs to talk among themselves.
Director Yeager explained it takes out of the equation Budget No. 2. The budget
that is being deferred to the next meeting is the budget including
electrification and it recognizes the need for Santa Clara Board members to do a
little more work.
Mr. Scanlon remarked if funds could be found from some kind of creative process,
the project could go for at least one more year.
The Board, by roll call, unanimously voted in favor of the motion as amended
REPORT OF LEGAL COUNSEL
Attorney David Miller reported the closed session
deals with a settlement of a condemnation action, real estate acquisition
involving the Lenzen Maintenance Facility
THE BOARD ADJOURNED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 12:15 P.M. AND RECONVENED INTO OPEN
SESSION AT 12:20 P.M.
Closed Session: Conference with Legal - Closed Session pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.9(a) VTA v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.
Action No. CV 798078
Attorney David Miller reported the Board met in closed session to consider the
remaining major land acquisition for the Lenzen Maintenance Facility by a
proposed stipulated resolution of a pending condemnation proceeding. He
recommended the Board authorize the Executive Director to enter into agreements
with the Union Pacific Railroad in a form approved by General Counsel to
provide for a stipulated judgment in eminent domain to clear the remaining
parcels subject to the condemnation case acquisition that was initiated earlier
and to amend the Purchase Agreement and one Construction and Engineering
Agreement previously executed with Union Pacific Railroad. The Joint Powers
Board will be relieved of certain track relocations, and other facility
relocations as well as any claim for liquidated damages.
The Board, by roll call, unanimously approved the proposed actions.
ADJOURNED: 12:20 p.m.
|